{"id":6383,"date":"2026-05-04T16:17:01","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T21:17:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/?p=6383"},"modified":"2026-05-04T17:29:23","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T22:29:23","slug":"t-dont-want-to-go-to-chelsea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/2026\/05\/t-dont-want-to-go-to-chelsea\/","title":{"rendered":"(T Don&#8217;t Want To Go To) Chelsea"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;Where is Chelsea\u2019s subway station?\u201d A <a href=\"https:\/\/transitmatters.org\/blog\/where-is-chelsea-mbta-subway-station\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/transitmatters.org\/blog\/where-is-chelsea-mbta-subway-station\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">blog post<\/a> last year by the transit advocacy group <a href=\"https:\/\/transitmatters.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">TransitMatters<\/a> asked this question. Chelsea, a small city of just over 40,000 residents, is not a place that most in the region think much about, let alone have been to. In fact, I\u2019m willing to bet that the most interaction the average Bostonian has had with Chelsea is a brief glimpse of the city\u2019s rooftops as one drives over the Tobin Bridge. Yet, this small city, which has only an infrequent commuter rail station and half-assed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), is as dense as areas of Cambridge, which are well served by the Red Line.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zooming out, when one looks at the T map radiating out from central Boston, one can\u2019t help but notice a rather sizable gap between the Orange and Blue Lines to the northeast of the city. While the city of Everett once hosted the Orange Line terminal before it was rerouted along its current alignment in 1975, and Revere has the Blue Line along its shores, Chelsea has never hosted a subway station.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>The geography that shaped Chelsea<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Like much of the northern end of North America, Boston was shaped by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wisconsin_glaciation\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wisconsin_glaciation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">massive glaciers<\/a> that covered the continent during the last Ice Age. It was the constant ebb and flow of the ice that over millennia formed a long moraine stretching from New Jersey to the tip of Massachusetts. The result is a string of islands and capes stretching from Long Island in New York to Martha\u2019s Vineyard, Nantucket, and Cape Cod in Massachusetts.<\/p><div id=\"vansh-2276042320\" class=\"vansh-content vansh-entity-placement\" style=\"margin-top: 32px;margin-bottom: 32px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vanmaps.com\/product-category\/track-maps\/\" aria-label=\"ad_long_v2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/ad_long_v2.jpg\" alt=\"\"  srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/ad_long_v2.jpg 1661w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/ad_long_v2-595x301.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/ad_long_v2-768x388.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/ad_long_v2-960x485.jpg 960w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1661px) 100vw, 1661px\" width=\"1661\" height=\"840\"  style=\"display: inline-block;\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Boston itself sits in a large basin, imaginatively called the Boston Basin, created when glaciers, over a mile thick in some places, made the area home. The constant movements of the ice built up areas of rock and debris in consistent, elongated hills known as drumlins. The city of Boston was founded on the Shawmut Peninsula, itself a geological formation built out of a series of drumlins. The drumlins have defined Boston as much as the clam chowder or the Red Sox: Beacon Hill, Copps Hill, Mission Hill, Fort Hill, Eagle Hill, Orient Heights, and Bunker Hill.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"821\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin-960x821.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6385\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin-960x821.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin-595x509.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin-768x657.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/topo_drumlin.jpg 1248w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Topographic map of Revere, Everett, Chelsea and Winthrop, MA. 1890<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>Further out, the Boston Basin\u2019s clear edge can be seen in a string of large hills and escarpments through Saugus, Malden, Medford, Arlington, Belmont, Waltham, Needham, and Milton. The most famous of these have been converted into parks: the Blue Hills, Middlesex Fells, and Lynn Woods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chelsea, along with Everett and Revere to the north, is home to a cluster of drumlins that are sandwiched between the Mystic River and Chelsea Creek, and in the north, the Rumney Marsh. The difficult topography and large wetlands that surrounded the area limited residential growth.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As railroads sprang up around Boston and reached out towards surrounding towns and cities, they needed to contend with these geographic impediments. The cheapest solution was always to bypass large hills. When the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastern_Railroad\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastern_Railroad\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Eastern Railroad<\/a> built its line through Chelsea, it needed to avoid the large hills to the north, opting to instead cut through the Rumney Marsh on its way to Lynn. Similarly, the railroad built its line to Saugus through Everett and Malden in a more circuitous route that avoided the same hills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>BERy vs Bay State Railway<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"1413\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-960x1413.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6386\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-960x1413.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-595x876.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-768x1130.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-1044x1536.jpg 1044w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy-1392x2048.jpg 1392w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1907-Central-Area-copy.jpg 1631w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of the BERy system in 1907. Note the dashed line at the top right, showing Bay State lines to the northeast.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Boston_Elevated_Railway\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Boston_Elevated_Railway\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston Elevated Railway Co<\/a>. (BERy), which built and operated the first subway in the United States, ran a <em>near<\/em> monopoly on streetcars in Boston and surrounding suburbs. But BERy wasn\u2019t alone. A few other operators ran streetcars between Boston and distant towns. One of these companies was the Boston and Northern Street Railway, later the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bay_State_Street_Railway\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bay_State_Street_Railway\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Bay State Street Railway<\/a>, and finally known as the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastern_Massachusetts_Street_Railway\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastern_Massachusetts_Street_Railway\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BERy had consolidated routes in Boston and its growing suburbs. Bay State ran streetcars and interurbans between Boston and smaller cities such as Lowell, Lynn, Lawrence, Brockton, and Fall River. Importantly, Bay State ran most of the streetcars that ran to and through Chelsea. Bay State had trackage rights on some routes into Boston, such as through Charleston to Haymarket Sq. Elsewhere, riders would have to transfer from BERy to Bay State streetcars and pay a second fare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BERy\u2019s monopoly allowed it to build and operate the first subway in Boston, and they designed the system around their existing streetcar network. The very first subway, from Park St to Boylston St, was built simply to take these streetcars off the congested city streets. When heavy rail lines were built (what became the Red and Orange Lines), stations often featured elaborate in-station transfers that would bring streetcars to the same level as the subway for an easy cross-platform transfer.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"304\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-960x304.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6387\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-960x304.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-595x188.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-768x243.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-1536x486.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BERy-Blue-Line-2048x648.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Boston Transit Commission map showing an early version of the East Boston Tunnel along Hanover St that would have fed directly into the Green Line. Around 1901.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>BERy built two tunnels for streetcars: the first subway (today, the Green Line) and the East Boston Tunnel (today, the Blue Line). The first subway included a number of locations for loops, where streetcars from neighboring towns would turnback rather than through-running deeper into Boston. This can most plainly be seen at Park St, Government Center (formerly Scollay Sq), and the original North Station stop included a ground-level loop underneath the elevated viaduct. [Due to the many name changes over the years, I\u2019m going to simply use the modern names for stations and lines for clarity.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Blue Line was initially designed to connect directly to the Green Line near present-day Government Center with through service between Boston and East Boston. Initial plans called for the tunnel to link up with the loop tracks under Hanover and Washington Streets, with the tunnel running down Hanover St, turning down Fleet St before passing under the harbor to East Boston. When the route was shifted along State St, an at-grade track connection was planned at the southern end of Government Center station. The original Blue Line terminal, Court St, was built at the same level as the Green Line, just to the east of the present station. Court St station was destroyed when the Blue Line was extended west to Bowdoin Sq, which required lowering the tracks under the Green Line.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\" noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"294\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-960x294.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6403\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-960x294.png 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-595x182.png 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-768x235.png 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-1536x470.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BTD-Annual-Report-1925-Plate-08-Maverick-Square-Station-Plans-\u2013-Boston-In-Transit-2048x627.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Maverick Sq station. 1925.Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>In East Boston, the Maverick Sq terminal was built with an incline for streetcars to continue into East Boston and two underground loops for tunnel-only service and streetcar turnback service. The East Boston Tunnel saw tremendous ridership coming from East Boston and many of the new beach communities popping up along the shore up to Lynn. Streetcars were how Malden, Everett, and Revere turned into bedroom communities.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BERy streetcars connected these new suburban communities to its network at the palatial Sullivan Sq terminal and later at the \u201ctemporary\u201d Everett terminal of the Orange Line. But Chelsea, which was primarily served by Bay State instead, was cut off from the larger network and cut off from Boston by two water crossings. Distance and hard terrain made these areas difficult places to develop and limited the prospects for an expensive rail rapid transit service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Tunnel plans<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/cityofbostonarchives\/8189240484\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\" noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"751\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k-960x751.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6388\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k-960x751.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k-595x466.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k-768x601.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k-1536x1202.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/8189240484_c756c9c588_k.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Chelsea swing bridge across the Mystic River. 1935. City of Boston Archives<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>As BERy consolidated its hold on transit around greater Boston, Bay State was struggling. It was locked out of the more lucrative routes in Boston, and its routes between smaller cities faced competition from steam railroads, as well as a small but growing number of automobiles. Bay State had only one direct link to the subway at Haymarket Sq, but this was only possible via a trackage agreement with BERy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bay State ran their streetcars over the Chelsea Bridge, a swing bridge that spanned the Mystic River between Charlestown and Chelsea. The bridge had to be opened to allow ships to pass, which delayed street traffic. The alternative route to Maverick Sq crossed a similar bridge with the same issues and required riders to pay a second fare to transfer. While BERy ran a popular streetcar line between Maverick Sq and Chelsea, Bay State lines served enough riders coming from further out that planners saw the potential for an additional subway to Chelsea.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"772\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b-960x772.webp\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6390\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b-960x772.webp 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b-595x479.webp 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b-768x618.webp 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b-1536x1236.webp 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-east-boston-tunnel50pct-80jpg_5238e28b-a5fb-49d6-a597-884601a7b36b.webp 1750w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map showing two alternative routes for a new tunnel to Chelsea. 1913. Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>The Boston Transit Commission, the state entity responsible for coordinating planning and construction with BERy, developed a plan to build a tunnel from Haymarket Sq to Chelsea, bypassing the Chelsea Bridge. Two routes were considered:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Route A ran along Hanover St in the North End before making a direct line to Broadway in Chelsea under the harbor.&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Route B would run along Washington St before curving under the Charlestown Navy Yard, terminating at Broadway as well.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Both schemes would have ended at a loop adjacent to Government Center, not connecting with the subway, and would remain independent should Bay State remain a separate company. BERy was not interested in building an expensive tunnel for a competitor, and Bay State didn\u2019t have the funds on its own.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>1920s<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"611\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955-960x611.jpg\" alt=\"Map of the proposed combined and reconfigured Green and Blue Lines. 1926. Source Boston in Transit\" class=\"wp-image-6391\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955-960x611.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955-595x379.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955-768x489.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/wmark-ReportonImprovedTransportationFacilities1926-Plate06_1500x955.jpg 1500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of the proposed combined and reconfigured Green and Blue Lines. 1926. Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>World War I put a stop to these plans, and Bay State\u2019s circumstances only worsened. After the war, Bay State was reorganized into the Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway. Post-war inflation made running a large, infrastructure-heavy mass transit system increasingly difficult. Both BERy and Eastern began replacing their low-ridership streetcar lines with buses. BERy had struggled with consistent service on the Green and Blue Lines, as streetcars increasingly were stuck in automobile traffic, and looked to expand capacity by converting the two streetcar subways into heavy rail. In 1924, the Blue Line was converted to heavy rail, running between Bowdoin Sq and Maverick Sq, where riders could transfer to streetcars.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Today\u2019s Blue Line was to be extended past Government Center and connected directly to the Green Line at Park St. This Yellow Line, as it is shown on the map, would continue along the Boylston St Subway to Kenmore Sq and would continue along the median of Commonwealth Ave to Warren St in Brighton, where a large transfer station would be built for connections to streetcars. Stations with high-level platforms would have been built at street level along Commonwealth Ave, similar to what the MBTA eventually built for the Green Line stations today.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"482\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903-960x482.jpg\" alt=\"Map showing the proposed Blue Line connection to the Green Line at Park St. 1926. Source Boston in Transit\" class=\"wp-image-6393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903-960x482.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903-595x299.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903-768x385.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903-1536x771.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate07_1800x903.jpg 1799w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map showing the proposed Blue Line connection to the Green Line at Park St. 1926. Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>In East Boston, the Yellow Line was to be extended one stop near present-day Airport Station, which would allow for a cross-platform transfer to the Boston, Revere Beach, and Lynn RR, a narrow-gauge railroad that served East Boston, Winthrop, Revere, and Lynn.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Between East Boston and Chelsea, a new waterfront boulevard and bridge were to be constructed. Meridian and Border Streets were to be expanded to allow for a dedicated median down the center of the streets. This new boulevard was to extend from Maverick Sq to a new bridge over the Chelsea Creek. The new span would be a drawbridge built higher than the existing bridge so that it would need to be opened less frequently. The new boulevard would expand Division St, then curve along Pearl and Hawthorne Streets until Bellingham Sq. Streetcars would be diverted along the median of the new boulevard, similar to how they run today along Commonwealth Blvd and Beacon St.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"504\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944-960x504.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6397\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944-960x504.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944-595x312.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944-768x403.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944-1536x806.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate10_1800x944.jpg 1799w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of the new boulevard between Maverick Sq to Chelsea. 1926. Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>While none of these plans made it off the drawing board, another proposal from the report eventually did. Towards the end of the report, planners outlined a new roadway through the heart of Boston to improve traffic flow. This was supported by a plan to convert the elevated Atlantic Ave Line into an elevated highway loop from the South End to Causeway St. This was the first instance of what eventually became the Central Artery.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"1125\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800-960x1125.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6402\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800-960x1125.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800-595x697.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800-768x900.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800-1311x1536.jpg 1311w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/plate16_1535x1800.jpg 1535w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of the proposed Central Artery. 1926. Source <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bostonintransit.com\/pages\/reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston in Transit<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Tobin Bridge and the Blue Line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the US, the Great Depression began in 1929. But in Boston, the economy had been declining for many years before the stock market crash, and the depression lasted here well after it had ended in the rest of the nation. The post-war Boston economy was stagnant, and planners looked to new public works to help get the region out of the rut. The Chelsea Bridge had been rebuilt in 1935, but an impact with a cargo ship had left it disabled. This, in part, led to Eastern Railways converting its streetcar fleet into buses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<a data-flickr-embed=\"true\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/boston_public_library\/8618711293\/\" title=\"Tobin Bridge over Mystic River looking toward Chelsea from Charlestown\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/8239\/8618711293_bdc224fa31_b.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"Tobin Bridge over Mystic River looking toward Chelsea from Charlestown\"\/><\/a><script async src=\"\/\/embedr.flickr.com\/assets\/client-code.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1948, a new high-level bridge was proposed to replace the ancient Chelsea swing bridge. Planners saw this as an important relief route for the overcrowded Sumner Tunnel, which was funneling car traffic through East Boston to the northeast. The new Mystic River Bridge, as it was known, was to connect to a new expressway bypass to Route 1 in Saugus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The new Mystic River Bridge, as it was originally named, was to be an important spoke in the new radial highway network being planned for the Boston region after the war. As all roads once led to Rome, these new expressways would fan out from a new trunk expressway being cut through the heart of Boston: the Central Artery. The Massachusetts Turnpike would serve traffic from the heart of the state, the Southeast Expressway would serve the South Shore, the Southwest Expressway would connect Boston to Providence, the Northern Expressway would connect to Lowell and New Hampshire, and the Northeast Expressway would serve Lynn and connect to the North Shore.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"614\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt-960x614.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6405\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt-960x614.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt-595x381.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt-768x491.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt-1536x982.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1962-Inner-Belt.jpg 1676w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of the proposed greater Boston highway network. 1962. <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/innerbeltexpress00mass\/mode\/2up\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Massachusetts. Dept. of Public Works<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>The Mystic River Bridge and Central Artery were the first two sections of this network to be funded and built. The two highways were to meet at a three-way elevated interchange built above City Sq in Charlestown. These roads were the first time Boston-area residents saw the true scale of destruction that post-war highway planners had envisioned. The building of the Mystic River Bridge, which was renamed the Tobin Bridge in 1967, and the Northeast Expressway (Route 1) through Chelsea and Revere displaced over 250 residents. Like all post-war highway bridges, the Tobin did not provide space for mass transit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the 1910s and 20s, rail transit had allowed the dense urban core of Boston to empty into the neighboring towns. After the war, cars and new highways continued the sprawl, bleeding transit and railroads of passengers. Planners looked at various solutions for solving the increased traffic that was growing faster than new roads could handle. In 1947, the bankrupt Boston Elevated Railway was transformed into the Metropolitan Transit Authority and was given the mandate to expand service into outlying towns and suburbs. The new MTA looked at the failing steam railroads as quick and affordable ways to expand mass transit and capture the growing suburban market.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/3304445209_3943d9ef68_o-1-scaled.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/3304445209_3943d9ef68_o-1.jpg\" alt=\"Map of proposed post-War expansion along former steam railroad lines. 1945.\" class=\"wp-image-6407\"\/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Map of proposed post-War expansion along former steam railroad lines. 1945.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>In 1952, the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Boston,_Revere_Beach_and_Lynn_Railroad\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Boston, Revere Beach &amp; Lynn Railroad<\/a> was the first of the old railroads to be purchased and connected to the Blue Line. The East Boston Tunnel was extended from Maverick Sq to the new Airport Station and connected to the railroad ROW. To save money, third rail power was not extended along the former railroad, which is why today the Blue Line operates with third rail power between Bowdoin and Airport, then switches to pantograph power to continue north. The former Winthrop branch was converted to bus service, and an extension north of Wonderland to Lynn was left for when more funds were available (an issue still unresolved to this day.) Unlike the plans from 1926, a branch to Chelsea was not included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In hindsight, it&#8217;s easy to argue that Boston got lucky by keeping its rail mass transit network operating and not completely selling out to the automobile. But even with generations of investment into mass transit, many areas of the region certainly paid the price for expressways. For Chelsea, the loss of manufacturing jobs, maritime jobs, and dozens of families displaced by the building of Route 1 and the Tobin Bridge combined to create a cocktail of disinvestment that has only been escaped in the last 20 years. As gentrification has made East Boston unaffordable, Chelsea has seen an influx of new residents who are thinking differently about the bridge and what the future might hold for the city.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>A Mass Transit Future?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Today, more than half of the traffic passing over the Tobin Bridge is to or from areas north of Chelsea (this is not \u201cironic\u201d, as the author of the TransitMatters post stated, but in fact how highways are designed to be). While Chelsea is served by the Newburyport\/Rockport commuter rail line, service is infrequent and only gets riders to North Station. Most of the residents that commute from Chelsea to Boston are working in the Financial District or at Logan Airport.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"710\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus-960x710.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6434\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus-960x710.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus-595x440.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus-768x568.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus-1536x1136.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mbta_chelsea_bus.jpg 1722w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.mbta.com\/sites\/default\/files\/2026-04\/2026-04-05-system-map.pdf\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/cdn.mbta.com\/sites\/default\/files\/2026-04\/2026-04-05-system-map.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">MBTA system map<\/a> showing bus lines converging in Chelsea.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>With poor rail service, it\u2019s no wonder that bus ridership is high. The 104, 111, and SL3 buses, which run through Chelsea, all have some of the highest ridership levels in the region. SL3 is the closest thing that Chelsea has to real rapid transit, with a dedicated ROW from Everett St to Eastern Ave. But the Silver Line still needs to use the Chelsea Street Bridge (a public road) to get into East Boston. This bridge is opened many times a day, delaying all traffic. There is a short ROW that the Silver Line uses between the bridge and the Airport Blue Line station, but then it must use the Ted Williams Tunnel to continue to South Boston. The dedicated ROW is no match for a constantly opening bridge and public traffic to the airport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2023, MassDOT announced that they were beginning to consider a future <a href=\"https:\/\/mass.streetsblog.org\/2023\/09\/20\/massdot-starts-planning-for-tobin-bridge-replacement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">replacement for the Tobin Bridge<\/a>. The bridge pre-dates interstate standards and lacks breakdown lanes. Like many post-war bridges, it was built to be cheap, not to last. A new crossing would be the ideal opportunity to right the mass transit wrongs of the past. As the TransitMatters post shows, the Route 1 corridor from Charlestown, through Chelsea, and into Everett and Revere has densities that rival other transit-rich areas of greater Boston.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Future plans<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"960\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-960x960.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6417\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-960x960.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-595x595.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin.jpg 1020w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Note: Walkshed population figures for existing lines exclude stations in Downtown Boston (the ones colored black on the map).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>In the TransitMatters post, a map is shown that outlines a hypothetical subway using the Tobin Bridge (or its replacement) as the core of the line. Three options are laid out, showing how many residents live near each hypothetical station. I find the map slightly misleading, as it could be misinterpreted as suggesting that each station would see the same levels of ridership. In actuality, the commuting patterns of these lines are more complex, mostly due to the existing lack of direct rail service to Boston.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Regional Rail<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/533b9a24e4b01d79d0ae4376\/t\/5ef372813b670f3474d90868\/1593012868116\/TransitMatters+RR+Phase+1+Map+200624.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\" noreferrer noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"1212\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/transitmatters_regionalrail-960x1212.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6418\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/transitmatters_regionalrail-960x1212.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/transitmatters_regionalrail-595x751.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/transitmatters_regionalrail-768x970.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/transitmatters_regionalrail.jpg 1020w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The TransitMatters Plan for Regional Rail Phase 1<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>One of the most important projects that TransitMatters has advocated for is proper <a href=\"https:\/\/transitmatters.org\/regional-rail\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/transitmatters.org\/regional-rail\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Regional Rail<\/a> in the greater Boston area. Regional Rail differs from the existing commuter rail by offering more frequent, all-day service. This can be achieved by converting the diesel-powered trains into electric, which, aside from being better for local communities, allows trains to run faster and more frequently.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TransitMatters has proposed upgrading the Newburyport Line with electric service as far as Beverly to provide more frequent service to the larger communities in the North Shore: Chelsea, Revere, Lynn, Swampscott, and Salem. Providing subway-like service would be cheaper and serve more riders than a single subway extension (such as the Blue Line to Lynn). But there\u2019s a catch. More commuters between Boston and northeast towns are heading to job centers in the Financial District and Back Bay or Logan Airport. The Newburyport Line would end at North Station, which isn\u2019t much of a draw outside of events at the Garden.&nbsp;This could be fixed by building the long sought-after North-South Rail Link, but that is outside the scope of just serving Chelsea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Regional Rail would require fare integration with subways to provide a free transfer. Under the existing fare structure, riders are more incentivized to take a bus to Haymarket for a free transfer than the commuter rail to North Station. But even with more frequent service and a free transfer, the Newburyport Line takes a longer, circuitous route into Boston (through Everett and Charlestown) than the direct route over the Tobin Bridge. To be clear, Regional Rail is a worthy investment; it\u2019s just not a silver bullet when it comes to rail mass transit for Chelsea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Tobin Bus Lanes that can be converted to light rail<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A replacement for the Tobin Bridge could provide a more cost-effective solution for transit to Chelsea. After all, a bridge is cheaper than a tunnel. However, a closer look at the Tobin Bridge reveals many difficult issues for any future service. While the bridge itself could be replaced, the approach roads on either side of the Mystic River limit what is possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<a data-flickr-embed=\"true\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/cityofbostonarchives\/9777179812\/in\/photolist-fTYAVJ-dY8ufA-dYjBVy-dYeKi8-dYo9Js-o3mh75-dYdVgn-dYerKc-pMXDa1-dPwQ6t-dYeqNz-dSZnpB-dT5Yim-e6syDB-fQcvnq-fFaQph-fFaKF7-dYjT2w-dYfWCM-dYjCz5-dYcFP4-fTVhwg-dYgdpF-dYjSJN-dYn74G-dYjCgY-dY66c3-dYcHzz-dYdqQ6-e6zqd3-dZPF1i-dWwwMb-dZVQNQ-dWrjCF-qdgsoa-dYdV8H-dWqTn2-dWwYsd-qSvckL-ra53b6-fTYpNn-dYdaVZ-dWwYbo-dWwYeo-dWwYp1-dY5nMd-dYoa5N-qJNbmB-dY2Ncz-pNbM4v\" title=\"Central Artery\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/7298\/9777179812_89a69939c6_b.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"Central Artery\"\/><\/a><script async src=\"\/\/embedr.flickr.com\/assets\/client-code.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n\n\n\n<p>On the Charlestown side, the Tobin Bridge originally fed directly into an elevated interchange with I-93. This structure was replaced as part of the <a href=\"https:\/\/ia601203.us.archive.org\/11\/items\/centralarterynor00mass\/centralarterynor00mass.pdf\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/ia601203.us.archive.org\/11\/items\/centralarterynor00mass\/centralarterynor00mass.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Central Artery North Area Project<\/a>, which relocated the interchange to the west of City Sq and buried the approach to the Tobin Bridge in a tunnel. The tunnel portal is stacked to align with the bridge decks. The southbound lanes enter the tunnel near Warren St, while the northbound lanes enter the tunnel further east, roughly near Prospect St. On the Chelsea side, the approach road keeps the stacked configuration deep into Chelsea, to 4th St, where it then begins to level out into a typical side-by-side configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Any replacement bridge would need to keep this stacked configuration to connect with the approaches. This is even more important on the Chelsea side, as any expansion of the bridge or highway right-of-way would require the demolition of dozens of homes. It\u2019s possible that this narrow ROW would need to be expanded anyway to bring the approach roads up to safe highway standards. The Tobin Bridge is notorious for not having breakdown lanes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<a data-flickr-embed=\"true\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/boston_public_library\/6810514080\/\" title=\"Mystic River Bridge construction &amp; traffic, downtown Boston\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/live.staticflickr.com\/7189\/6810514080_beb5ece972_b.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"Mystic River Bridge construction &amp; traffic, downtown Boston\"\/><\/a><script async src=\"\/\/embedr.flickr.com\/assets\/client-code.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n\n\n\n<p>Typically, bridges with lanes for transit place these lanes at the same level as the traffic lanes. Doing so here would cause issues for transit vehicles entering and exiting the bridge. This is less of an issue on the Charlestown side, which brings the lanes to ground level sooner, but the Chelsea side stays elevated far longer, then transitions into a typical side-by-side configuration with no additional space for transit. The Northeast Expressway (Rt 1) suffers from similar design flaws that are typical in older, pre-Interstate highways. Even removing lanes for transit is not so simple here: lanes could be taken for transit, but there is no extra space for stations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One solution for adding transit lanes to a replacement bridge would be to add a third, lower deck. Unlike the upper two decks, this deck would be bi-directional. The value of having this deck on the lowest level is so that transit vehicles can enter and exit the bridge before automobile traffic. On the Charlestown side, vehicles could run along Chelsea St before entering the lower-deck near Vine St, while on the Chelsea side, vehicles could enter and exit at Everett St. Adding a third deck would mean that the approach roads would need to be raised to keep the clearance under the bridge. This is probably ok on the Chelsea side, which has a loner approach. But on the Charlestown side, this will be tricky given that the approach leads into a tunnel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given the lack of existing capacity on the T near downtown Boston, we don\u2019t know yet what type of service would use the new transitway. The simplest solution would be for buses, though these lanes would only be able to serve local buses from Chelsea, Revere, and Everett, not the longer-distance express buses that would be confined to the upper deck traffic lanes. The general configuration of the roadway structure doesn&#8217;t easily allow for HOV\/bus lanes on the Northeast Expressway (if they were ever to be added) to connect with a lower-deck transitway. Still, local buses running on a dedicated bridge transitway and connecting to bus lanes on city streets all the way to Haymarket Sq would dramatically speed up service for thousands of riders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Subway<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As I am not a bridge engineer, I am not certain what type of span would be needed and what type of grades would be required on either side of the bridge. Should the bridge require steeper grades (than, say +5%), heavy rail, like that of the Orange Line, is likely out of the question. Light rail, as seen on the Green Line, could traverse these grades more easily.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"718\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2-960x718.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6426\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2-960x718.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2-595x445.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2-768x574.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2-1536x1148.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/subwayoptions2.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Three possible subway alternatives: Orange and Green Line via the Tobin Bridge replacement, and Blue Line across the Chelsea Creek.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Orange Line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A branch of the Orange Line would likely be a non-starter. Not because of potential grade issues, but rather because of ridership imbalance. Existing Orange Line stations in Charlestown and Malden have such high ridership that branching the Orange Line after North Station would halve service and cause terrible crowding. Should the Orange Line be branched further north, after Sullivan Sq, the new branch would double in length, running through Everett along the Newburyport commuter rail line. This would not save riders from Chelsea much time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Blue Line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A simpler solution might be to build a branch off the Blue Line. Between Airport and Wood Island stations, the Blue Line briefly dips into a tunnel. Here, a flying junction can be built that will follow the route of the old Grand Junction RR tracks, which are now used by the Martin A. Coughlin Bypass Rd. Part of the old railroad ROW still exists, but the former railroad bridge has long since been removed. The SL3 route of the Silver Line uses the bypass road to run between the Airport station and Chelsea but uses Chelsea St and the Chelsea St Bridge to cross into Chelsea. Traffic, both on land and water, delays Silver Line buses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Silver_Line_busway_construction_west_of_Broadway,_June_2017.JPG#\/media\/File:Silver_Line_busway_construction_west_of_Broadway,_June_2017.JPG\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/7\/76\/Silver_Line_busway_construction_west_of_Broadway%2C_June_2017.JPG?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&amp;utm_campaign=imageinfo&amp;utm_content=original\" alt=\"Silver Line busway construction west of Broadway, June 2017.JPG\" width=\"100%\"><\/a><br>By <a href=\"\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Pi.1415926535\" title=\"User:Pi.1415926535\">Pi.1415926535<\/a> &#8211; <span class=\"int-own-work\" lang=\"en\">Own work<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\" title=\"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=67443383\">Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A branch of the Blue Line would basically replace the SL3 route. The Silver Line busway was built on former railroad tracks, though costs were saved by building only one lane beneath the Broadway overpass. A Blue Line extension could replace the busway at grade between Bellingham St and Washington Ave, but would need to be built below grade west of Washington Ave due to the number of grade crossings that still exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Blue Line branch would almost certainly require the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mbta.com\/projects\/red-blue-connector\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.mbta.com\/projects\/red-blue-connector\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Red-Blue Connection<\/a> to be built first. Present Blue Line headways are roughly half of what a typical 2-track rail transit line can support. Ancient signals and the tight turnback loop at Bowdoin Sq limit service on the line. If a branch to Chelsea were built today, service to Wonderland would be cut in half. Should new signals be installed, as well as a higher capacity terminal built as part of an extension to Charles St, then the added capacity could support the new branch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A modern Blue Line extension would differ from the 1926 proposal as it would only serve Chelsea, not Eagle Hill in East Boston. Nor would it serve Charlestown as a transitway over a Tobin Bridge replacement would. While a project of this scope should cost about $2 billion, new ridership would be limited because of the smaller areas covered. Bus riders would still have a more direct route into Boston over the Tobin Bridge than through East Boston.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Green Line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"817\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map-960x817.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6421\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map-960x817.png 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map-595x507.png 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map-768x654.png 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map-1536x1308.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/New-Tobin-Bridge-Track-Map.png 1950w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">MBTA Track Map showing the new Chelsea subway connecting to the Green Line at Government Center.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>If a more direct route is needed to truly put a dent in traffic coming from the northeast, then the only line with the necessary capacity is the Green Line. The Green Line was originally built with 4-tracks from Scollay Sq (now Government Center) to North Station. The original Haymarket Sq station had a 4-track, 2-island platform configuration but was abandoned when the new (current) station was built. The current station replaced the two middle tracks with two island platforms. But the Government Center loop was kept in place, allowing service from the north to turn back on the original middle tracks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This loop will be key for a Green Line extension. A new Tobin Bridge branch would be very similar to the original Boston Transit Commission plans but would integrate into the existing Green Line. Thanks to the Government Center urban renewal project, the area above the loop tracks is virtually empty (save for a cop-hating playground slide). The new branch would connect to the loop, which would be connected to the two through-running tracks via switches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The new tunnel would need to dive below the Central Artery Tunnel so as not to conflict with space for a possible (or perhaps existing) North-South Rail Link and follow Hanover St through the North End; a new station would be located around Prince or North Bennet Streets. At the end of Hanover St, the tunnel would turn to the northwest, passing under the harbor to the Navy Yard. If the Tobin Bridge replacement is built with a lower-level transitway, the tunnel could integrate with the transitway at a portal location near Tremont St in Charlestown. A new station here would serve both the Navy Yard and the Bunker Hill neighborhood of Chelsea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the Chelsea side, the Green Line branch would touchdown at, and turn north along, Everett St. If planned today, Everett St could be expanded with little disruption to private property so that a transit median could be built. This could be used for BRT before light rail is added later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As discussed in the TransitMatters piece, Chelsea is as dense as areas of Cambridge that are served by the Red Line. This implies that Chelsea could support higher-capacity transit than the Green Line offers. The route proposed above could be covered by an existing branch (perhaps the C, for Chelsea), but this would not have the same capacity as a heavy rail service like the Red Line. Should Chelsea require more service, trains could short-turn at Government Center along the existing but unused loop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Beyond Chelsea<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"960\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-960x960.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6417\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-960x960.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-595x595.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/transitmatters_tobin.jpg 1020w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Note: Walkshed population figures for existing lines exclude stations in Downtown Boston (the ones colored black on the map).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>All the alternatives I\u2019ve outlined above only go so far as Chelsea itself, not past. Going back to its difficult terrain, extending rail transit further into the northeastern suburbs will likely be expensive and complex. Even the most frequently proposed route, along Route 1, is fraught. The expressway was squeezed through existing neighborhoods and steep hills. Removing lanes isn\u2019t feasible (they aren\u2019t wide enough), and even if it was, the sharp curves make adding ADA compliant rail stations harder (this is slightly less of an issue for low-floor light rail). Building a new elevated viaduct along the highway may be the solution, but the high costs beg the question, is this even the best route for such an investment?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"461\" src=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-960x461.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-960x461.jpg 960w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-595x286.jpg 595w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-768x369.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-1536x737.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/charliemta_bridgealt-2048x983.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Proposal from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/97144142@N07\/53207045160\/in\/dateposted\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/97144142@N07\/53207045160\/in\/dateposted\/\">CharlieMTA<\/a> for a new bridge and highway alignment.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>Since the 1920s, planners have been scheming on ways to combine highways and transit lines. The problem is these two pieces of infrastructure are often at odds with one another. Building transit along highways saves money on ROW acquisition, but the highway often destroys any walkable location that is best served by transit. The question is then, if we are to rebuild the Tobin Bridge, should we include transit at all? This isn\u2019t to say Chelsea isn\u2019t worthy of transit, but that maybe the bridge alignment isn\u2019t the best route. A tunnel route could be designed to reach denser, more walkable locations that would see more ridership than a route along a highway.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another idea is to use an entirely different alignment for a new bridge. Given that any alignment, even one that hugs the existing bridge, will require property to be taken, should we not consider other options that might be less destructive? If this is the case, then maybe many of the technical challenges for a transitway would be addressed. Given Massachusetts and US politics currently, I think it will be a while before a replacement crossing breaks ground. I think having bus lanes would be a good first step, even if it would likely be all that ever gets built.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Elvis Costello &amp; The Attractions - (I Don&#039;t Want To Go To) Chelsea\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/XvRQDsH0Yho?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry-summary\">\n&#8220;Where is Chelsea\u2019s subway station?\u201d A blog post last year by the&hellip;\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/2026\/05\/t-dont-want-to-go-to-chelsea\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &ldquo;(T Don&#8217;t Want To Go To) Chelsea&rdquo;<\/span>&hellip;<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6434,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,5,1,6,7,8],"tags":[792,74,24,25,26,1044],"class_list":["post-6383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-boston","category-cities","category-future-mbta","category-maps","category-transportation","tag-chelsea","tag-massachusetts","tag-mbta","tag-subway","tag-t","tag-tobin-bridge","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6383"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6442,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6383\/revisions\/6442"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vanshnookenraggen.com\/_index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}